Get News Updates RSS RSS Feed
Get News Updates
Real Estate
Mortgage
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
News
HOME
Front Page
Bulletin Board
Letters
Editorials
Schools
Sports
GMN Photo Page
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Section
Middlesex County South
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact us
Services
Advertiser Index
Copyright©
2000 - 2008
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use
February 28, 2008
Search Archives


Future of Forney House in hands of the court
Two lawsuits pending as citizens group appeals to save house
BY JESSICA SMITH Staff Writer
As the ongoing fight over the fate of the Forney House inMilltown headed to court lastweek, the group hoping to save the historic structure had a new, larger entity in its corner.

The Forney House, on North Main Street, Milltown, is slated to be demolished so that a bank branch can be built in its place. However, an appeal to reverse that decision is pending in state Superior Court.
Even if a judge rules to allow demolition of the approximately 150-year-old house tomakeway for a bank,members of the John C. Evans Project, which is working to save the North Main Street house, could realize successwith the help of the federalAdvisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP).

"They don't get involved all the time. In this particular case, I guess they deem this as something worthy of being considered. We are obviously cautiously optimistic," said Stuart Lieberman, the Princeton-based attorney working for the John C. Evans Project.

The group is appealing theMarch 2007 decision by the Milltown Zoning Board of Adjustment that would allow the building to be demolished to make way for a Valley National Bank branch.

On Friday, state Superior Court Judge Jessica Mayer, sitting in New Brunswick, reserved decision on whether to uphold the board's approval of the bank branch.While there is no word on when a decision will be issued, Lieberman said he thinks it could take a few weeks.

"This case is not just about saving an old house on Main Street. It goes beyond that," said Michael Shakarjian, a trustee of the John C. Evans Project.

A borough ordinance does not allow for drivethroughs in the town's B-1, or business, zone.As part of the approval, the zoning board granted Valley National Bank a variance to allow them to construct a drive-through at the proposed branch.

"We feel that if this was not challenged, it could open the doors for more drive-throughs in the B-1 zone," Shakarjian said. "We feel that weakening this prohibition could have a dramatic negative effect on our town."

Attorneys for ValleyNational Bank declined to comment on the case.

Even if the approval is upheld in court, members of the John C. Evans groupmay still have a chance to preserve the Forney House, as approval from the federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is necessary before the bank can proceed with its plans.

Members of the John C. Evans group expressed dissatisfaction with the OCC in its handling of the matter, saying the agency was not following its own regulations, and was hasty in moving toward drafting a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with the bank late last year. However, theMOAhas yet to be drafted, and Shakarjian said theACHPwill nowbe involved in the necessary Section 106 review process, which appraises possible effects of actions taken on historic sites.

"That means the MOA process has been put on hold," Shakarjian said.

While the citizens' group was mobilizing to achieve its goals, others involved in the battle were doing the same.

In August, Valley National Bank filed a counterclaim against the John C. Evans Project, stating that the group has interfered with its economic advantage, as well as with its rights under the sale contract that the bank has with the current owner of the Forney House building, Dr. Bhudev Sharma.

"In my view, it's a meritless suit," Lieberman said. "You don't use the court as a club to intimidate and beat somebody down so they'll be afraid to participate in the process."

Lieberman characterized the counterclaim as a SLAPP, or strategic lawsuit against public participation, suit. Some suits are termed as such when they involve corporations or developers bringing litigation against citizens' groups that take an oppositional stance to their plans, according to Lieberman.

ValleyNational's counterclaimhas yet to be heard in court.

And according to Lieberman, there is another new legal angle. He said Sharma has now filed a lawsuit againstmembers of the groupwho are seeking to stop the sale of the house.

Sharma declined to comment.

Although Shakarjian had requested that the ACHP get involved in thematter in the past, the federal entity advised himto continue working with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the OCC, he said. It was not until Sharma filed suit against two members of the citizens' group that Meghan MacWilliams Baratta of the SHPO reached out toACHP to intervene, he said.

"When she heard that, that was finally the straw that broke the camel's back," Shakarjian said. "[The ACHP] has truly gotten involved, and that's a good thing."

The Forney House was built in the mid- to late- 1800s by the Evans family, whose son served asMilltown's first mayor. It was converted into a medical facility by John C. Evans and operated as such from 1907 until the 1970s.Duringmany of those years, itwas run by Dr. Norman C. Forney Sr., the town's first surgeon.

While Sharma and representatives of Valley National have asserted that the house is in such a state of disrepair that it cannot be preserved, the John C. Evans Project aims to find a purchaser that would be interested in saving the structure.

The group can be e-mailed at evansforney@aol.com.