Get News Updates RSS RSS Feed
Get News Updates
Real Estate
Mortgage
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
News
HOME
Front Page
Bulletin Board
Letters
Editorials
Obituaries
Schools
Sports
GMN Photo Page
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Section
Middlesex County South
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact us
Services
Advertiser Index
Copyright©
2000 - 2008
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use
Letters January 18, 2007
Search Archives


Supreme Court members undeserving of high salary

The chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court has the audacity to consider their $200,000-plus salary so low as to constitute a "constitutional crisis?!" They do not deserve such a high salary, partly because:

1) The court has refused to address jury nullification since 1895. The court has refused to stop the trial courts from committing a fraud-upon-the-jury by lying to the jury that the jury must follow the trial judge's instructions of law even if they disagree with the law.

2) The court has refused to spell it out in black and white whether the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right, which has been incorporated within the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution so as to apply to "any person."

3) The court has continued to endorse junk science known as forensic psychiatry. The court has done nothing to stop trial court abuses in railroading criminal defendants for psychiatric examination and "treatment" simply because they find the defendant "mentally ill." The court has also failed to adequately restrict self-incrimination problems associated with psychiatric examination and "treatment."

4) The court has refused to overrule its precedent which classifies a corporation as a "person" within the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. We are no longer easily able to cancel the charter of corporations. Corporations have spiraled out of control, with inadequate accountability.

5) The court has contorted the "interstate commerce" clause to prevent private citizens from growing marijuana and hemp plants in the privacy of one's own property.

6) The court has used international treaties to interpret the U.S. Constitution.

7) The court has skewed immigration laws for massive incursion of "undocumented workers" overpopulation, as described by the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

In summary, the court has supported the slow encroachment on our fundamental rights by an agenda for the international power elite.

Richard Paul Zuckerman

North Brunswick